Welcome to the class blog! The John Jay - Vera Fellows Program is a collaborative effort between John Jay College and the spin-off agencies of the Vera Institute of Justice, combining an internship and participation in a seminar taught by faculty from John Jay's Interdisciplinary Studies Program. (To see a video about the John Jay - Vera Fellows Program, click here.) Part of the seminar experience is weekly participation in the class blog, which keeps the conversation going from week to week and will be a place for you to share your thoughts and concerns about the materials discussed in seminar as well as the internship experience. The opinions expressed on this blog do not necessarily reflect the views of the Vera Institute of Justice or its spin-off organizations. While the blog is open to the public and anyone, theoretically, can comment, only class members and invited guests will be able to post. You can also look for us on our student and alumni page on Facebook.
Each student has been assigned one week to write the "post." Please post within 24 hours after class. Every week, each student must comment on the post (feel free to comment more than once). Please comment by Monday afternoon to allow time for further questions and responses and so that we can read all the entries before class.

Friday, September 25, 2015

Good Afternoon young leaders of tomorrow (and today).


In yesterdays class we discussed our individual site's mission: what we liked about it, didn't like about it, what we'd change, etc. A few of us were confused about exactly what their mission was--so fleshing through the mission paragraphs and honing in on verb words that work as indicators for the "real" mission statement was great to know.


For this weeks blog post I'd like us to talk about relating with your client(s) and/or the demographic of people you are helping. Professor Rose brought up the term "driving method" *inserts Professor Rose's hand gesture* to describe the mission statement of your respective site. One thing that drives me is knowing that I can in some way relate to young adults who have committed status offenses.


In what ways have you related to the client(s) and/or demographic of people you are helping at your site?   In what ways do you think its good to take your job at your site personally and when it would become problematic? Examples would help, but please keep your client and site confidentiality in mind. Also, Please post your revised mission statement highlighting the segment that resonates most with you.


I think of Nicolas's case of where he has to directly speak with individuals from behind a jail cell and how physically close he can be with a person, but still feel distant. I think it is important for us to understand that on a deeper level, we can all relate. I don't work directly with the kids and/or young adults who are effected by Status Offenses, but growing up, I too, like Nancy, had trouble traveling to my middle school. In the winter when the weather became unbearable, I dreaded walking by myself, and sometimes decided to stay home due to inclement weather (what I considered inclement conditions for walking). This is just my experience in Westbury and can only imagine how Texas was for Nancy and many other young adults I fight for every Wednesday and Friday.


I think its good for me to take it personal that these kids are often times victimized because it gives me that "driving" force to take my job seriously. It would become problematic if I were to equate my example to the same level of injustice as many young adults whose been through different, more severe experiences.


My revised Status Offense Reform Center mission statement is: "The Status Offense Reform Center aims to help policymakers and practitioners create effective, community based responses for keeping young people who commit status offenses out of the juvenile justice system and safely into homes and communities.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Great points Andrene! I like the ideas behind this blog posting. A lot of the people who look for services at Safe Horizon are people who are victims of human trafficking. Men, women, and children are in our offices almost everyday seeking help, weather it may be counseling, financial and legal assistance, or housing. Most of our clients have experienced abuse in one form or another, and most are Spanish speaking. I can relate to my clients in a number of ways, some more personal than others. Although I have never experienced being trafficked before, I have experienced abuse, and we all have in one way or another. This is not limited to physical, verbal, or sexual abuse. In a way we have all been abused by the interlocking systems of oppression. As an Afro-Latina, I have been rejected from a number of opportunities because I was too Black to be Latina, too Latina to be Black, or for the fact that I was just a woman of color. Taking things personally is something that most people encounter when working in direct services, and it is problematic when the service providers begin to show signs of vicarious trauma, or the trauma that is the result of hearing about a client’s problems and abuses. There are a lot of young women who come into our office with their children as well, desperately looking for a way out. The sad part is that not everyone can be helped, and we have to turn some people away because we don’t’ have what they need, or there just isn't enough.


Mission Statement:
Safe Horizon's mission is to provide support, prevent violence and advocate justice for victims of crime and abuse, their families and communities, both domestic and international. At Safe Horizon, confidentiality is our priority to ensure the safety of our clients when providing legal and financial assistance, housing, counseling, and policy advocacy.

Unknown said...

Great prompt Andrene! In response to your first point, I've had the opportunity to interview defendants from various backgrounds at Central Booking, but I often find myself relating most with individuals that are around my age. I guess I sometimes think about how I would feel if I were some high school or college student behind bars for something minor (I would freak out). Most defendants my age also tend to show more respect/are more willing to answer our questions and I think this is usually the case because many of them are in there for their first offense and are unfamiliar with the system. On the other hand, individuals who are older and who have had prior arrest charges often give us more problems because they assume that their prior arrests will disqualify them for the chance of an ROR (release on own recognizance), which is totally untrue.

I also find myself connecting with defendants of Chinese descent and have had the opportunity to use my proficient Cantonese to connect with them. I find myself empathizing most with Chinese immigrants who don’t speak English because the language barrier often prohibits them from understanding why they are in there (chances are that they also don't know their rights). I have found some of them to be really anxious, especially if they're in the cells for committing a small crime. As a result, I am always on standby to try to answer their questions or to inform them that a translator from the court will be with them soon.

There have also been times that I questioned the necessity of detaining individuals who have been arrested for small crimes. Like Andrene said, these cells often act as a barrier and can almost be dehumanizing. Honestly, the cells that some of these defendants are placed in bear a lot of resemblance to the cages my pet birds are in. Sometimes, it even feels condescending to be interviewing from the other side of the cell. I think it’s also worth mentioning that someone arrested for theft of services could very well be placed into the same cell as someone arrested on murder charges, which I find to be absolutely ridiculous.

On the other hand, I've heard from my mentor that Central Booking at the Brooklyn site has much better facilities where interviews are conducted in individual booths, rather than done through opposite sides of a cell. I would much prefer interviewing someone in a booth because it gives the interviewee more privacy and may increase the chances that he or she answers honestly to questions because there are less people listening (for example, the homeless man I interviewed may not have been so resistant to admit that he was homeless if there weren’t other people listening in the cell).

I think it's good to take your job at your site personally until it starts affecting your judgment. Like Andrene said, taking something personally gives you a drive and motivation to get the job done. However, it can also potentially cause you to be judgmental and negatively affect your attitude. As a result, it’s important for us to realize when we may need to distance ourselves from a situation to reduce the chances that we say/do something we regret or burn out. This is why I think that having a mentor/supervisors really has its advantages.

Unknown said...

Original Mission Statement: “The Mission of the New York City Criminal Justice Agency, Inc., is to assist the courts and the City in reducing unnecessary pretrial detention.”
My Version of CJA Mission Statement: "The mission of the New York City Criminal Justice Agency, Inc., is to assist individuals in exercising their 8th amendment rights and to reduce the unnecessary pretrial detention of those who have strong ties to their community, are at a low risk of recidivating, and are expected to willingly return to court for future appearance dates by recommending them to be released on their own recognizance."

Originally, I had no problem with the CJA mission statement. After reading it a few times over and dissecting it word for word, however, I began to see its flaws and realize that it lacked specificity. As I had mentioned in class, reading Farmer’s “Three Stories, Three Paradigms, And a Critique of Social Entrepreneurship” challenged me to think about the distinction between rights and services in relation to what we do at CJA. I then began to realize that we as interviewers are there to assist defendants in exercising their rights, and not to provide some “charity” service, like the ones described in Hilfiker’s piece. This realization caused me to consider how detrimental it could be if interviewers internalized the mindset that we as interviewers are providing a service out of goodwill, rather than working to uphold the constitutional rights of the defendants. Having this approach could cause us as interviewers to go into interviews with poor attitudes. In addition to clarifying that the CJA seeks to assist individuals (not just the courts and the city), my version of the mission statement clearly states that the CJA seeks to reduce the unnecessary pretrial detention of defendants, rather than leave it up to the reader's interpretation as to what "unnecessary pretrial detention" really means. Lastly, I use the word “individuals” because I realize that the word “defendant” often has a negative connotation to it.

Unknown said...

I do not have the opportunity to interact with the population that my department at Vera serves. However, I have an idea on what a majority of them might look like. They are minority men, more specifically black men. I can relate to the demographic of people my department is helping because I share their experiences before incarceration. There are just certain negative things you are guaranteed to face as a minority male growing up in certain communities. This could include academic struggles, disciplinary challenges, petty crime or exposure to gangs, drugs etc. You or your family’s reactions to these experiences are what can pave the road to a life of constant growth or severe limitation. The two things I believe that influence whether or not you will be involved with the criminal justice system is one mistake or an opportunity. An example that illustrates what I mean is a book I read in the past called The Other Wes Moore. It is about two black men who were raised in the same community and share the same name. However, they had very different futures. One became a Rhodes Scholar alongside numerous other accomplishments while the other is serving a life sentence. The difference between the two is that the Rhodes Scholar’s mother had the resources to put him in boarding school when the negativity became overwhelming. This opportunity made the difference. Everyone doesn’t have an opportunity that comes around at the perfect moment or even at all. Those who lack opportunity eventually make a mistake with a heavy penalty before they can even create their own opportunity. Sometime the mistakes are not even their fault. They could have just been in the wrong place at the wrong time. There are plenty of innocent people in prison. I believe what may have kept me out of harm’s way growing up is after school programs and church activities. My family probably didn’t have the resources to send me to boarding school but took advantage of the after school programs my school offered and encouraged/forced me to join the church choir, drama team, usher team, bible study, Sunday school and the list goes on. I was too busy to be in the wrong place at the wrong time even if I wanted to (malls, fast food restaurants, parks, etc.). What happens to the students who heard about the after school program when the number of available seats already filled up in addition to nonreligious parents? Sure some students might attend karate, piano, guitar lessons but not everyone. Those who are left entertain themselves as a group at the places I mentioned before. All it takes is one altercation within that group, in a public place, gone wrong to change the course of a person’s life forever.


Unknown said...

So it is important that I take my job at Vera personally because many of them are in the criminal justice system because of a mistake they made. A mistake I may have made had I not been preoccupied by my opportunity to go to after school or be an active church member. So it is up to us on the outside to reduce the severe limitations put on people who are incarcerated. Prison is there to punish law violators but it should also be fair on the inside and prepare inmates for re-integration. The punishment is the time they spend on the inside with limited access to what we might have on the outside. They shouldn’t be subjected to the harshest of conditions such as months in solitary confinement, which can have implications on their mental health. They should also stay engaged by participating in offered options of productive activity. This week at my internship I got the chance to sit in a City Council hearing on a Resolution in Support of President Barack Obama’s Second Chance Pell Pilot Program. The panelist, some of who were formerly incarcerated, were testimonies to how valuable not giving up on those behind bars can be.

Which of these do you all believe is my department’s mission? I’m going with the first one.
Vera’s Center on Sentencing and Corrections (CSC) works with government leaders to advance criminal justice policies that promote fairness, protect public safety, and ensure that resources are used efficiently. The center draws on the skills and expertise of its staff, as well as the practical knowledge of working criminal justice professionals who face similar justice challenges.

CSC helps officials find more cost-effective ways to protect public safety. Our research and analysis can pinpoint inefficient and ineffective policies and identify alternative approaches that work. Our technical assistance brings practitioners together to examine these findings and engage in problem solving that is focused and productive.

Unknown said...

Monnero, Nicolas and Gabby, thank you for taking this blog post exactly where I wanted you to. I could've very well gave the same personal example of my culture connecting me directly to the target population of young underrepresented girls being subjected to certain treatment via the Status Offense regulations, but it was more exciting for me to have started off with a smaller, less complex example to pave the way for you all to feel comfortable with sharing your personal experiences at a larger scale. I love it.

Unknown said...

Since I am doing research I guess it is more difficult to relate to the clients that the Center on Immigration and Justice helps. The main program that the center is focusing on helps undocumented children get legal representation either through justice AmeriCorps members or through pro-bono lawyers. I don’t understand the difficulty that the children go through to get here, or the fear they feel when they attend their first court hearings. I can’t relate to them and so a lot of the research I do isn’t important to me. I guess my mentor started getting the feeling that I am really uninterested and so she gave me more literature to read. As I started reading narratives and reasons why the children left I started relating to them more. I started feeling empathetic to the females who deal with sexual violence and the men who suffer from domestic violence and gang violence. I think it was important for me to start taking the clients stories personally and the research we did personally because it made me more efficient. It made me want to read more and do what I could to help even if it meant just synthesizing information and taking notes on evaluations. I guess it would be problematic if I started taking their problems home with me as Gabby had said in class. I get really emotional and so it wouldn’t be healthy for me to take their problems and think about them constantly in my free time.


My revised mission statement is:
Vera's Center on Immigration and Justice (CIJ) is a liaison between governmental organizations and nonprofits and communities. CIJ aims to improve the experiences of immigrants and their families maneuvering the immigration process and ensuring their human rights are unviolated while keeping in mind cultural differences. The center focuses on two objectives: increasing detained immigrants’ access to legal information and counsel, and improving relationships between immigrant communities and law enforcement officials through education. The center oversees many federal programs, develops and implements pilot programs, researches problems faced by immigrant communities, creates survey indicators, and conducts evaluation and empirical research.

Jessica Jean said...

At CASES I deal with a lot of young adults in my age group. Many of them, from the stories they share are not too different from myself. Some of them lack the motivation to go to school or just got caught up in the negative attention surrounding them and find themselves in this program. I relate to the participants in many ways because when I was in high school I wasn't the scholar I was today. I was suspended repeatedly my freshman year for insubordination, fighting and disturbing class. I was involved in several altercations outside of school but on school grounds that resulted in negative outcomes on my record, hoe faculty and staff viewed me as well as my peers. The crowd I hung out with may have been entertaining and lively but ultimately was bringing me down. There was a point in time where I didn't want to go to school, showed up and left after a period or two of lessons,cut class or didn't go altogether because it wasn't for me. I debated finishing school and joining the military because I didn't want to go to school after high school. I probably would've done that if I didn't actually take a good look at myself and reevaluate the path I was going down. I see that part of me in the participants today and I do want to share my story with them in order to give them motivation but to also break down the barriers that divide us. I find that this may also be problematic due to the recurring thoughts of them thinking I am better than them. Which I don't think at all. Everyone lives under different circumstances and I want them to see that there is still time to change their lives around.

My revised mission statement is as follows: The mission of CASES is to bridge the divide between the community, at-risk youth, education systems and law enforcement through innovative services, educating our youth in order to pave better pathways leading to a brighter future filled with opportunities, promoting positive advocacy and improving overall health while aiming for justice.

Unknown said...

The ways I have related to the demographic of the clients that are served at Common Justice is by the burden of stereotypes they face. Based upon my knowledge of the agency, the main demographic that is being assisted is African American males, which I can relate to all on its own. However, a main distinction to make is that these participants have committed a felony, which is literally life threatening considering how it is a hindrance to many opportunities/rights. Having a felony can be associated with stereotypes/misconceptions that the individuals are uneducated, violent, hopeless, as well as many others. In some ways, I believe that being African American I am faced with a multitude of stereotypes that I must overcome just like the clients of Common Justice. It is perceived that black males are also uneducated, violent, and hopeless. Being forced to have this perception comes the choice to either submit into the stereotypes or to overcome the stereotypes just like the participants of Common Justice. I personally believe that no matter how many accomplishments/achievements I have, with a couple of wrong decisions I can be in their shoes as well.
However, this can be beneficial because it builds a level of comfort and interconnectedness between the clients and the faculty. In contrast, this could potentially become problematic considering how this can cause vicarious trauma, which is a term that Gabby has introduced to the class. Being so deeply related to the clients can cause an unhealthy emotional investment due to the fact you may feel that you are both fighting very similar battles in some respects.

Revised Mission Statement:
Common Justice is an innovative victim service and alternative-to-incarceration program based on restorative justice principles. The program works with young people, between the ages of 16 to 24 years old, who commit violent felonies, and those they harm. Common Justice aims to prevent and diminish violence, in addition to facilitating the well-being of both the responsible party and the party harmed. The program provides participants with a respectful and effective means of accountability, an equitable and dignified avenue to healing.
Furthermore, Common Justice seeks to transform the criminal justice system's dependency on punitive measures for serious crimes and the lack of respect and equitable treatment for both the responsible and harmed party. The program will provide effective and impartial reform for all parties involved, with the intention to establish restorative justice principles for all forms of crime, with the ultimate and adamant goal to cease being a punitive state in this era of mass incarceration. Thus, ceasing the need to have social institutions such as Common Justice.

Unknown said...

Excellent prompt and responses students! You once again took the class to the next level! That's exactly where it needed to go INSERT hand gesture;)).

Valfrie Plasencia said...

Following our engaging exercise in our last class, this is a fitting prompt, Andrene! In answering this, I want to look back to my first experience with direct client interaction at the CEO (Center for Employment Opportunities), even though I am technically placed to work on research on the agency’s projects. Last Friday, I sat with one of the job coaches to observe and briefly gain a direct interaction with the participants who reports to the JC. What a job coach (JC) does is to sit down with a participant one at a time to obtain necessary information for initial processing, to hear updates about their worksite experience, and help prepare for job interview, such as resume building, making sure that they have proper interview clothing, and they are confident enough to take on an actual employment beyond the transitional job that the agency offers. Generally speaking, 99% of CEO’s clients are men. When the JC would ask the men what kind of job they seek through the agency, they usually begin by saying that they could do maintenance or construction work (these two areas of labor jobs are the top fields in CEO’s labor market for their clients). One specifically began his response by saying that he has a dream job, but he keeps in mind that he has to be realistic as of the moment, considering his current life circumstances, so he would have to be content to resort to maintenance jobs, or one within doing stocks and retail. The JC followed up by asking what his dream job was, and the man answered that since he likes to write music, that he wants to be a musician, to go as far as working in the music industry. It was a poignant moment for me, sitting there and hearing this person light up and warmly talk about where his true passion is, the thing that truly lights up his soul. It was at that moment where I stopped taking notes and immerse at that one moment of true and genuine connection where it was not all about the technicalities and procedures. It was a moment of camaraderie, of humanity. I almost had the urge and interrupt to say that I myself am a musician. This man, like me, understands and has come to terms with the fact that present conditions may not permit individuals to truly get to the point in life where they wish to be. Unfortunately for them, they had serious encounters with the criminal justice system.

For the case of the CEO and for so many other nonprofit organizations designed to help individuals fill an important part in their lives, it remains to recognize and understand the humanity that we share among one another. As I said of our mirror exercise from our Thursday class and how it relates to our respective agency and to social justice in general, it allows for a chance to assume the position of the person on the other end of the line who we wish to help (in other words, to use the stock phrase, put ourselves in their shoes). Yesterday I had the chance to do a mirror exercise of my own with my time at the agency today, in that I sat in the introductory three-hour long class that the participants have to attend as the beginning of their journey with the CEO. I took notes and papers, watched a video, and immersed myself in what these people experience themselves after getting introduced to the agency that they hope would help them greatly. I will admit, that there is still some distance that I feel from all the other people in the room, in that I was, and still am, an outside observer, privileged enough to be where I am and comparatively in a safer position from the oppressing systems of injustice that brought the men and women into the criminal justice system. This part of self-consciousness is what I acknowledge to be the tool of resource for my work within social justice advocacy. It’s important to know and understand the people that we at the agency are serving in order to provide the participants’ actual needs (and know their wants, as well), in proper accordance with their respective situations.

Valfrie Plasencia said...

On the other hand, I don’t see where it can be harmful to take my job personally as far my establishment of personal connection with the clients go. There are norms that participants are encouraged to follow, and the CEO provides an atmosphere that is very accepting and amiable to the people. Everything that goes as they get the participants through is constructive. It makes sense to think that I would be as detached as possible to the actual problems facing our clients and the realities concerning their situation considering that I will primarily be working with data. But that is why I asked to have the first-hand experience of what it is like to go through the CEO’s model of providing our clients the employment services and other support that it can offer, so that I will gain a clearer understanding of what it means to be working in such an environment, and what it means for the people we are working with.

****************************************************************************************

Revised Mission Statement:

“The Center for Employment Opportunities (CEO) is dedicated to providing immediate, effective and comprehensive employment services to men and women with recent criminal convictions who are often systematically neglected due to racial, economic, and political injustice in the United States. Our highly structured and tightly supervised programs help participants regain the skills and confidence needed for successful transitions to stable, productive lives with the aim of helping combat the cycle of incarceration and recidivism.”

Unknown said...


I'm finally able to respond to prompts like these because I finally got to shadow my mentor interview a cilent. It was supposed to be several cilents but the rest didn't show as they had more important things to handle. In terms of identity I feel like I'm increasingly being triggered by how much I'm relating to the victims of the shelters because I too was a victim of domestic violence recently. I thought about this before starting and thought it work out very well and It is in someways and in other ways it's difficult but I feel like like this will be a great experince to vent out compartmentalized thoughts; I'm aiding people who experinced varying levels of the personal violence I experinced and most of the time it's cathartic for me. I believe that it's good to be conscious that there aspects of this work I'm going to take personally and channel a drive/passion from that. I feel like I'm becoming very dedicated to being safe, kind, a helpful (even if it's just helping them up the short stoop with a cart of groceries). They only moments when it becomes truly problematic for me to take the work personally has only really been when I recieve trainings on the ways that criminal court, family court, and immigration law interact with issues of domestic violence. My experince involved trying to get my ex-partner deported and looking at the paperwork reminds me of when I was filing out this information. Thankfully I don't know this won't translate into visible feeling of negativity or discomfort with cilents because I know that those interactions have to be performative for me because I am ultimately here to provide service. It's not about me, it's about them. These women that I've met so far I been through so much and they still keep their heads up and go about their days, I suppose thats something else I relate to with these women. I'm not too sure if any of you are familar with the Olivia Pope character on "Scandal" but that's how I feel I relate to these women; we experince a unbearable amount of trauma and we "Pope it". We smile, we learn, and we proceded about our days. Thanks so much for the prompt

DV LEAP provides a stronger voice for victims of domestic violence by fighting to overturn

unjust trial court outcomes that --further put women, men and children's lives at risk. We educate victims on how to navigate the laws and systems that have oppressed them and enabled personal violence We advance

legal protections for victims of domestic violence and their children so as not to further the

damage that has been done to them physically, psychologically, and financially through expert

appellate advocacy, training lawyers, psychologists and judges on best practices, and

spearheading domestic violence litigation in the Supreme Court. We advocate for individuals

who live in a society where their abusers receive approval from their very government officials;

we save and protect lives.--

I didn't know how to highlight